Many commentators highlight the likelihood of a low return environment over the next 5 -10 years or more.
Even looking through the shorter-term challenges of the current market environment as highlighted in a recent Post, many publicly available forecasts underline the potential for a low return environment over the longer term.
The most often referenced longer-term return forecasts are the GMO 7 Year Asset Class Forecast.
As at 31 July 2019 they estimated the real returns (returns after 2.2% inflation) for the following asset classes as follows:
Share Markets |
Annual Real Return Forecasts |
US Large Capitalised Shares |
-3.7% |
International Shares |
0.6% |
Emerging Markets |
5.3% |
Fixed Income Markets | |
US Fixed Income |
-1.7% |
International Fixed Income Hedged |
-3.7% |
Emerging Debt |
0.7% |
US Cash |
0.2% |
As GMO highlight, these are forward looking returns based on their reasonable beliefs and they are no guarantee of future performance.
Actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in forward looking statements.
The variation in sequence of returns is an additional consideration e.g. global sharemarkets could continue to move higher and then fall sharply to generate a 0.6% annual return over the next seven years. Or they could do the reverse, fall sharply within the next year and then float higher over the next 6 years to generate the 0.6% return.
The sequencing of returns is important for those in the retirement death zone, see my previous Post on the riskiest time of saving for and being in retirement.
Looking at the return forecasts the following observations can be made:
- Within equity markets Emerging Markets are offering more value and US equities the least; and
- The return expectations for Fixed Income are very dire, particularly for those developed markets outside of the US.
For comparison purposes, the long-term return of US equities is 6.5%.
The Fixed Income returns reflect that more than $US15 trillion of fixed income securities across Europe and Japan are trading on a negative yield.
Based on some measures, interest rates are at their lowest level in 5,000 years!
GMO is not alone with such longer-term market forecasts, those from Research Affiliates and State Street are provided below. They all have different methodologies and approaches to calculating their forecasts. Notably, they are all pointed in a similar direction.
This analysis highlights that outstanding returns have been delivered over the last 10 years, particularly if you are invested in the US and New Zealand sharemarkets and have had longer dated interest rate exposures.
The Balance Portfolio (60% Equities and 40%) has benefited from this environment.
The last 10 years have been amongst the best for a New Zealand investor invested in a Balanced Portfolio, if they had managed to stay fully invested during that time.
The New Zealand sharemarket has returned 13.3% over the last 10 years and New Zealand Government Bonds 5.9%. Therefore, a Balanced Fund has returned 10.3% over the last decade!
Global Equites have returned 10.0%, led higher by the US sharemarket, and Global Bonds 4.3% over the last 10 years. Globally, the Balanced Portfolio has benefited from the 35 year long decline in interest rates.
Therefore, the forecast returns are pretty frightening from a Balanced Fund perspective. Certainly, returns are not likely to be as strong over the next ten years as they have been over the last decade.
This calls into question the level diversification of a Balanced Fund of only equities and fixed income.
This issue can be considered from two angles, the need to increase the level of diversification within a Balanced Portfolio and the effectiveness of fixed income in providing diversification benefits to a Balanced Portfolio given historically low interest rates.
On the first issue, although a lack of true portfolio diversification has not disadvantaged investors greatly over the last 5-10 years, the potential to earn other sources of returns from true portfolio diversification may be of more value over the next 10 years. It is certainly a risk that should be considered and managed.
With regards the effectiveness of fixed income in diversify sharemarket risk in the future, this dynamic is best captured by the following insightful observation by Louis Grave: investors are hedging overvalued growth stocks with overvalued bonds.
What he is saying, is that given current valuations in the US of both the sharemarket and fixed income a Balanced Portfolio no longer has the degree of diversification it once had.
Of course, interest rates could fall further, and provide some offset from a falling sharemarket, as they have historically. Nevertheless, the effectiveness and extent of this offset is limited given historically low interest rates.
Most importantly, given current valuations, there is the scenario where both fixed income and sharemarkets underperform at the same time. This would be like the stagflation environment of 1970, where inflation is rising, and economic growth is muted. This is a scenario worth considering.
In my mind the biggest risks to portfolios are in longer term fixed income securities or “bond proxies”, such as slow-growth and dividend-oriented investments. Listed Property and infrastructure securities would fall into this definition.
It is quite likely that those looking for diversification benefits from listed property, global and domestic, and listed infrastructure, are likely to be disappointed. As they would had been during the Global Financial Crisis. They only provide limited portfolio diversification benefits, not true portfolio diversification.
The expected low returns environment throws up a lot of issues to consider:
- True Portfolio diversification. Institutional investors accept that portfolio diversification does not come from investing in more and more asset classes. This has diminishing diversification benefits e.g. adding global listed property or infrastructure to a multi-asset portfolio that includes global equities. True portfolio diversification is achieved by investing in different risk factors that drive the asset classes e.g. duration, economic growth, low volatility, value, and growth. Investors are compensated for being exposed to a range of different risks.
- Consistent with the above, there is a growing evolution within the Wealth Management Industry, a paradigm shift which is resulting in the death of the Policy Portfolio (i.e. Balanced Portfolio).
- The growing risks with traditional market indices and index funds, as highlighted by the low return forecasts.
- Increased innovation within Exchange Traded Funds as investors seek to diversify their traditional market exposures.
I plan to write more on the last two points in future Posts.
Happy investing.
Please see my Disclosure Statement
Global Investment Ideas from New Zealand. Building more Robust Investment Portfolios
Research Affiliates – 10 Year Forecast Real (After Inflation)
Share Markets |
Real Return Forecasts |
US Large Capitalised Shares |
0.7% |
International Shares |
3.2% |
Emerging Markets |
7.7% |
Fixed Income Markets | |
US Fixed Income |
-0.8% |
International Fixed Income Hedged |
-0.5% |
Emerging Debt |
4.2% |
US Cash |
-0.3% |
State Street also provides:
- They are more optimistic in relation to developed market sharemarket, with Emerging Markets outperforming developed markets, Global Listed Property underperforms both developed and emerging market equities
- They see very low returns from Global Fixed Income.